Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-06-22 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2017-06-22 House Journal Page 1684 HB 159 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that that the provisions of Uniform Rule 47 regarding the carryover of bills and resolutions be suspended to allow the House to consider HB 159 and the accompanying title change resolution, SCR 101. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 1551) on the following: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 159(FIN) am "An Act relating to the prescription of opioids; relating to voluntary nonopioid directives; relating to the controlled substance prescription database; relating to the practice of dentistry; relating to the practice of pharmacy; relating to the practice of medicine; relating to the practice of podiatry; relating to the practice of osteopathy; relating to the practice of nursing; relating to the practice of optometry; relating to the practice of veterinary medicine; relating to the duties of the Board of Pharmacy; relating to pharmacists; providing for an effective date by repealing the effective date of sec. 73, ch. 25, SLA 2016; and providing for an effective date." and 2017-06-22 House Journal Page 1685 SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 159(FIN) "An Act relating to the prescription of opioids; relating to voluntary nonopioid directives; relating to the controlled substance prescription database; relating to the practice of dentistry; relating to the practice of pharmacy; relating to the practice of medicine; relating to the practice of podiatry; relating to the practice of osteopathy; relating to the practice of nursing; relating to the practice of optometry; relating to the practice of veterinary medicine; relating to the duties of the Board of Pharmacy; relating to pharmacists; relating to the definition of 'practitioner'; providing for an effective date by repealing the effective date of sec. 73, ch. 25, SLA 2016; and providing for an effective date." (SCR 101 - title change resolution) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative LeDoux rose to a point of order. The Speaker reminded the member to confine remarks to concurrence. Representative Tuck moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 159(FIN) Concur YEAS: 29 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, Millett, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Nays: Eastman, Johnson, LeDoux, Neuman, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton, Wilson 2017-06-22 House Journal Page 1686 Excused: Thompson And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS CSHB 159(FIN). Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.